Modernization Hub

Modernization and Improvement
The Cold War: Crash Course US History #37

The Cold War: Crash Course US History #37

Hi I’m John Green; this is Crash Course
U.S. history and today we’re gonna talk about the Cold War.
The Cold War is called “Cold” because it supposedly never heated up into actual
armed conflict, which means, you know, that it wasn’t a war.
Mr. Green, Mr. Green, but if the War on Christmas is a war and the War on Drugs is a war…
You’re not going to hear me say this often in your life, Me from the Past, but that was
a good point. At least the Cold War was not an attempt to make war on a noun, which almost
never works, because nouns are so resilient. And to be fair, the Cold War did involve quite
a lot of actual war, from Korea to Afghanistan, as the world’s two superpowers, the United
States and the U.S.S.R., sought ideological and strategic influence throughout the world.
So perhaps it’s best to think of the Cold War as an era, lasting roughly from 1945 to
1990. Discussions of the Cold War tend to center
on international and political history and those are very important, which is why we’ve
talked about them in the past. This, however, is United States history, so let us heroically
gaze–as Americans so often do–at our own navel.
(Libertage.) Stan, why did you turn the globe to the Green
Parts of Not-America? I mean, I guess to be fair, we were a little bit obsessed with this
guy. So, the Cold War gave us great spy novels,
independence movements, an arms race, cool movies like Dr. Strangelove and War Games,
one of the most evil mustaches in history. But it also gave us a growing awareness that
the greatest existential threat to human beings is ourselves. It changed the way we imagine
the world and humanity’s role in it. In his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, William
Faulkner famously said, “Our tragedy today is a general and universal physical fear so
long sustained by now that we can even bear it. There are no longer problems of the spirit.
There is only the question: When will I be blown up?”
So, today we’re gonna look at how that came to be the dominant question of human existence,
and whether we can ever get past it. intro
So after WWII the U.S. and the USSR were the only two nations with any power left. The
United States was a lot stronger – we had atomic weapons, for starters, and also the
Soviets had lost 20 million people in the war and they were led by a sociopathic mustachioed
Joseph Stalin. But the U.S. still had worries: we needed
a strong, free-market-oriented Europe (and to a lesser extent Asia) so that all the goods
we were making could find happy homes. The Soviets, meanwhile, were concerned with
something more immediate, a powerful Germany invading them. Again. Germany–and please
do not take this personally, Germans–was very, very slow to learn the central lesson
of world history: Do not invade Russia. Unless you’re the Mongols.
(Mongoltage.) So at the end of World War II, the USSR “encouraged”
the creation of pro-communist governments in Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland–which was
a relatively easy thing to encourage, because those nations were occupied by Soviet troops.
The idea for the Soviets was to create a communist buffer between them and Germany, but to the
U.S. it looked like communism might just keep expanding, and that would be really bad for
us, because who would buy all of our sweet, sweet industrial goods?
So America responded with the policy of containment, as introduced in diplomat George F. Kennan’s
famous Long Telegram. Communism could stay where it was, but it would not be allowed
to spread. And ultimately this is why we fought very
real wars in both Korea and Vietnam. As a government report from 1950 put it the
goals of containment were: 1. Block further expansion of Soviet power
2. Expose the falsities of soviet pretensions 3. Induce a retraction of the Kremlin’s
control and influence, and 4. In general, foster the seeds of destruction
within the Soviet system. Harry Truman, who as you’ll recall, became
President in 1945 after Franklin Delano Prez 4 Life Roosevelt died, was a big fan of containment,
and the first real test of it came in Greece and Turkey in 1947.
This was a very strategically valuable region because it was near the Middle East, and I
don’t know if you’ve noticed this, but the United States has been just, like, a smidge
interested in the Middle East the last several decades because of oil glorious oil.
Right, so Truman announced the so-called Truman Doctrine, because you know why not name a
doctrine after yourself, in which he pledged to support “freedom-loving peoples” against
communist threats, which is all fine and good. But who will protect us against “peoples,”
the pluralization of an already plural noun? Anyway, we eventually sent $400 million in
aid to Greece and Turkey, and we were off to the Cold War races.
The Truman Doctrine created the language through which Americans would view the world with
America as free and communists as tyrannical. According to our old friend Eric Foner, “The
speech set a precedent for American assistance to anticommunist regimes throughout the world,
no matter how undemocratic, and for the creation of a set of global military alliances directed
against the Soviet Union.”[1] It also led to the creation of a new security
apparatus – the National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Atomic
Energy Commission, all of which were somewhat immune from government oversight and definitely
not democratically elected. And the containment policy and the Truman
Doctrine also laid the foundations for a military build-up – an arms race – which would
become a key feature of the Cold War. But it wasn’t all about the military, at
least at first. Like, the Marshall Plan was first introduced at Harvard’s Commencement
address in June 1947 by, get this, George Marshall, in what turned out to be, like,
the second most important commencement address in all of American history. Yes, yes, Stan,
okay. It was a great speech, thank you for noticing. Alright, let’s go to the Thought
Bubble. The Marshall Plan was a response to economic
chaos in Europe brought on by a particularly harsh winter that strengthened support for
communism in France and Italy. The plan sought to use US Aid to combat the
economic instability that provided fertile fields for communism. As Marshall said “ our
policy is not directed against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty,
desperation and chaos.” [2] Basically it was a New Deal for Europe, and it worked;
Western Europe was rebuilt so that by 1950 production levels in industry had eclipsed
pre-war levels and Europe was on its way to becoming a U.S. style-capitalist-mass-consumer
society. Which it still is, kind of. Japan, although not technically part of the
Marshall Plan, was also rebuilt. General Douglas MacArthur was basically the dictator there,
forcing Japan to adopt a new constitution, giving women the vote, and pledging that Japan
would foreswear war, in exchange for which the United States effectively became Japan’s
defense force. This allowed Japan to spend its money on other things, like industry,
which worked out really well for them. Meanwhile Germany was experiencing the first
Berlin crisis. At the end of the war, Germany was divided into East and West, and even though
the capital, Berlin, was entirely in the east, it was also divided into east and west. This
meant that West Berlin was dependent on shipments of goods from West Germany through East Germany.
And then, in 1948, Stalin cut off the roads to West Berlin. So, the Americans responded
with an 11-month-long airlift of supplies that eventually led to Stalin lifting the
blockade in 1948 and building the Berlin Wall, which stood until 1991, when Kool Aid Guy–no,
wait, wait, wait, wait, that wasn’t when the Berlin Wall was built. That was in 1961.
I just wanted to give Thought Bubble the opportunity to make that joke.
Thanks, Thought Bubble. So right, the Wall wasn’t built until 1961, but 1949 did see
Germany officially split into two nations, and also the Soviets detonated their first
atomic bomb, and NATO was established, AND the Chinese Revolution ended in communist
victory. So, by the end of 1950, the contours of the
Cold War had been established, West versus East, Capitalist Freedom versus Communist
totalitarianism. At least from where I’m sitting. Although
now apparently I’m going to change where I’m sitting because it’s time for the
Mystery Document. The rules here are simple. I guess the author of the Mystery Document
and about 55% of the time I get shocked by the shock pen.
“We must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive
program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination by creating
a situation in the free world to which the Kremlin will be compelled to adjust. Without
such a cooperative effort, led by the United States, we will have to make gradual withdrawals
under pressure until we discover one day that we have sacrificed positions of vital interest.
It is imperative that this trend be reversed by a much more rapid and concerted build-up
of the actual strength of both the United States and the other nations of the free world.”
I mean all I can say about it is that it sounds American and, like, it was written in, like,
1951 and it seems kind of like a policy paper or something really boring so I…I mean…
Yeah, I’m just going to have to take the shock. AH!
National Security Council report NSC-68? Are you kidding me, Stan? Not-not 64? Or 81? 68?
This is ridiculous! I call injustice. Anyway, as the apparently wildly famous NSC-68
shows, the U.S. government cast the Cold War as a rather epic struggle between freedom
and tyranny, and that led to remarkable political consensus–both democrats and republicans
supported most aspects of cold war policy, especially the military build-up part.
Now, of course, there were some critics, like Walter Lippmann who worried that casting foreign
policy in such stark ideological terms would result in the U.S. getting on the wrong side
of many conflicts, especially as former colonies sought to remove the bonds of empire and become
independent nations. But yeah, no, nothing like that ever happened.
Yeah, I mean, it’s not like that happened in Iran or Nicaragua or Argentina or Brazil
or Guatemala or Stan are you really going to make me list all of them? Fine. Or Haiti
or Paraguay or the Philippines or Chile or Iraq or Indonesia or Zaire or, I’m sorry,
THERE WERE A LOT OF THEM, OKAY? But these interventions were viewed as necessary
to prevent the spread of communism, which was genuinely terrifying to people and it’s
important to understand that. Like, national security agencies pushed Hollywood
to produce anticommunist movies like “The Red Menace,” which scared people. And the
CIA funded magazines, news broadcasts, concerts, art exhibitions, that gave examples of American
freedom. It even supported painters like Jackson Pollack and the Museum of Modern Art in New
York because American expressionism was the vanguard of artistic freedom and the exact
opposite of Soviet socialist realism. I mean, have you seen Soviet paintings? Look
at the hearty ankles on these socialist comrade peasants.
Also because the Soviets were atheists, at least in theory, Congress in 1954 added the
words “under God” to the pledge of allegiance as a sign of America’s resistance to communism.
The Cold War also shaped domestic policy–anti-communist sentiment, for instance, prevented Truman
from extending the social policies of the New Deal.
The program that he dubbed the Fair Deal would have increased the minimum wage, extended
national health insurance and increased public housing, Social Security and aid to education.
But the American Medical Association lobbied against Truman’s plan for national health
insurance by calling it “socialized” medicine, and Congress was in no mood to pay money for
socialized anything. That problem goes away.
But the government did make some domestic investments as a result of the Cold War–in
the name of national security the government spent money on education, research in science,
technology like computers, and transportation infrastructure. In fact we largely have the
Cold War to thank for our marvelous interstate highway system, although part of the reason
Congress approved it was to set up speedy evacuation routes in the event of nuclear
war. And, speaking of nuclear war, it’s worth
noting that a big part of the reason the Soviets were able to develop nuclear weapons so quickly
was thanks to espionage, like for instance by physicist and spy Klaus Fuchs. I think
I’m pronouncing that right. Fuchs worked on the Manhattan Project and
leaked information to the Soviets and then later helped the Chinese to build their first
bomb. Julius Rosenberg also gave atomic secrets to the Soviets, and was eventually executed–as
was his less-clearly-guilty wife, Ethel. And it’s important to remember all that
when thinking about the United States’s obsessive fear that there were communists
in our midst. This began in 1947 with Truman’s Loyalty Review System, which required government
employees to prove their patriotism when accused of disloyalty.
How do you prove your loyalty? Rat out your co-workers as communists. No seriously though,
that program never found any communists. This all culminated of course with the Red
Scare and the rise of Wisconsin senator Joseph McCarthy, an inveterate liar who became enormously
powerful after announcing in February 1950 that he had a list of 205 communists who worked
in the state department In fact, he had no such thing, and McCarthy
never identified a single disloyal American, but the fear of communism continued. In 1951’s
Dennis v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the notion that being a communist leader
itself was a crime. In this climate of fear, any criticism of
the government and its policies or the U.S. in general was seen as disloyalty. There was
only one question–when will I be blown up–and it encouraged loyalty, because only the government
could prevent the spread of communism and keep us from being blown up.
We’ve talked a lot about different ways that Americans have imagined freedom this
year, but this was a new definition of freedom–the government exists in part to keep us free
from massive destruction. So, the Cold War changed America profoundly:
The U.S. has remained a leader on the world stage and continued to build a large, powerful,
and expensive national state. But it also changed the way we imagine what it means to
be free, and what it means to be safe. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next week.
Crash Course is created by all of these nice people and it is possible because of you and
your support through Subbable is a crowdfunding website that allows
you to support the stuff you love on a monthly basis. Our Subbable subscribers make this
show possible. Thanks to them. If you value Crash Course,
please check out our Subbable. There are great perks there. And thanks to all of you for
watching. As we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome…Wait, wait, wait,
Stan, is that music copyrighted? All right! It’s not! Woo!
That saved us a thousand dollars.

100 comments on “The Cold War: Crash Course US History #37

  1. My history teach went into the band room at my school and saw that someone put a picture of Stalin on one of the lockers
    A week later he went back just so he could say hi to Stalin

  2. 8:28, 9:14 Indonesia mentioned. In 1965 USA indirectly killed 500.000-1.000.000 "communists" here and established 32 years dictatorship in place.

  3. 9:55 VS "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." So that's how the US government oppression of the "free world" gained even more traction? I'm not saying communism is any better than the arbitrary rules of the Dept. of Human Services or Social Security Admin, but we're not exactly looking like we have a whole lot of integrity here.

  4. There's really no end to the righteous Apocalyptic mythology we Americans engage in as a result of the secularized Protestantism upon which our constitutional system is based. If it's not one "evil" that motivates us to our next self-righteous "adventure," it will always be another. Surely none of us believe this pattern, which has repeated itself endlessly since the founding of the United States, is just a coincidence? I mean, maybe we could have given ourselves a free pass in the 1800s, when everything seemed "new," and when we convinced ourselves that Manifest Destiny justified our every action. Maybe that was understandable, given the behavior of other European imperial powers, and given the way many Americans viewed themselves as better and different from those powers. But after WWI and WWII? True, Stalin (and the number of nuclear arms the Soviet Union built up) was terrifying, but to just launch into a state of endless war, jumping from one continent to another, assuming that every culture in the world shares the unique views developed in colonial America, all for the sake of "free market Jesus," Come on now. You are toying with fire if you assume Jeffersonian republicanism and Hamiltonian federalism are some universal tropes. Maybe an introspective chill pill is in order.

  5. There is only one question: What peer-pressured ideological stance must I take to be considered "acceptable" by this generation's standards for "normalcy?" It will never, ever be any different.

  6. good video but getting confused with facts and jokes. Maybe try to speak on important historical events rather than spend time making fun of certain words or people. I'ts just confusing.

  7. The video was great, but I would've preferred that they explain some factors that led to people defecting in the Cold War.

  8. Sounds like what is going on now.. On both sides, if someone disagrees with you "They're unpatriotic and HATE AMERICA!"

  9. The most dangerous nation in the whole world is the US, you are making the world a shitty place you rapists and criminals.

  10. Some errors. The Latin American countries and Iran were not colonies of Britain or France. South East Asia and Indonesia were.

  11. watching these videos out of school is really less stressful than in school cuz u actually get to pause the video and write the answer down before he blurts out the next one lol

  12. The captions under the names of the historical figures are funny. IDK why but these videos help so much, I was watching other video and nothing was sticking, thanks <3

  13. im supposed to write a whole essay on this tomorrow and I watched this whole video and still have no idea what the cold war was

  14. I'm currently listening at 1.25 speed and it sounds normal and his actions seem to be at normal speed. Do they slow down the episodes in post-production? hmmm conspiracy

  15. ☻/ This is Bob, Copy and paste him

    /▌ all over Youtube

    / so he can take over

    and return the old comment section

  16. Thank you so much John I got a -1 on my AP exam instead of a -5
    keep up the good work 🙂

  17. stalin lifted the blockade in 1949 on may 12th and it was khrushchev who built the wall in 1961 years after stalins death in 1953

  18. I refuse to believe that the Finnish were not the reincarnations of the Mongols during the Winter War.

  19. Me: hey bro do u know who john green is?
    My bro: who is he
    Me: bra you should see/watch him.
    I showed my bro the guy.
    My bro: he's not green.

  20. Everyone thinks
    Stalin vs. Hitler, far left economically vs alt-right culturally.
    But what if… Stalin and Hitler actually had romantic feelings for each other?
    The resulting ideology, the ultimate belief,

  21. Censorship of any philosophy other than the established one is still rife today. Fear of nationalism in Europe is leading to native European ethnic extinction and replacement. And fear of socialism in America which has let globalist corporations lobby the government and given disproporsional amounts of influence to Zionists.

  22. pls pls pls talk more about the CIA
    include their drug trafficking in Nicaragua and their attempts at mind control through LSD in MKUltra
    its hilarious what these people did in the fight against communism

  23. Wow, this episode hit it spot on in every quote. (I think i mean i judge history the same way as John does at my age of 34)

  24. You're right, John. The reason the US opposed communism was to sell products. It had nothing to do with communism being an inherently brutal, murderous ideology that equaled Nazism in its evil. 😛

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *